The mysterious role of the United States on the issue of Hong Kong and Kashmir has been revealed

The mysterious role of the United States on the issue of Hong Kong and Kashmir has been revealed

For the geographers and students of history, geography and politics, a very interesting and surprising situation has arisen at this time; on the one hand, Jammu and Kashmir has been illegally and forcibly occupied by India in one way and Hong Kong on the other. Under one agreement, the British renowned columnist Chaudhry Farrukh Shahzad writes in one of his columns. There were riots, and China's problems are increasing day by day. The thinking is that the world powers are completely silent on the Kashmir issue while supporting India, but in Hong Kong, everyone is happy inside and China's opposition and declaration are being opposed at all levels and human rights. Allegations of violations have exposed the face of the world, especially the United States. Kashmiris are not being supported because they are Muslim, while on the other hand, Hong Kong is mentioned, the heart of the United States is filled with pain and the thorns in England are also chewing. This double standard is a tragic situation that is expected to create many more flashpoints globally in the future. The issue is being ignored by not only the United States but the whole world, but now it is globally. But a bit of improvement has started. During Prime Minister Imran's tenure in the United States, when US President Donald Trump offered mediation to resolve the Kashmir issue, it had an adverse effect on India and, by eliminating Kashmir's special status, imposed curfew there, oppressed Kashmiris. Made the chain of torture much faster. And then instead of stopping India from doing so, the US president began to say that it was a problem between India and Pakistan that they should resolve together. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with the US President in the French city of Beavertz last month in connection with the G-Season meeting. Nefavi but instead of making any further contribution to himself, simply said that it was hoped that Pakistan and India would work together to resolve the issue. That they will do their best to resolve the Kashmir dispute. Analysts at President Trump's insistence on offering Kashmir mediation, suggest that the US president wants to focus all his attention on ending the war in Afghanistan. President Trump does not want two nuclear powers involved in a new war in the region because of Kashmir. Analysts say if Pakistan is involved in a dispute with India, it will not be able to play any role in the Afghan peace process. So President Trump is offering mediation. In fact, President Trump wants to celebrate himself as a statesman in the US presidential election next year and must have the credit to address a major global problem.

According to analysts, President Trump has not yet been successful in resolving disputes with North Korea, Iran and other countries. India will never accept any such arbitration offer as it will negate its long-standing position. India, which includes the influential countries of the world in seven countries, takes advantage of this opportunity. He wanted to strengthen his statement on Kashmir. According to media reports, the Prime Minister of India also discussed the Rafale aircraft agreement with the French President. Global affairs experts believe that since the Shimla agreement, India has been of the view that no third party intervention in the Kashmir dispute will be acceptable.He said that Pakistan's statement should now be that after the recent measures taken by India, the Shimla Treaty had no recourse. India, on the other hand, does not want to discuss the Kashmir issue, and when other countries say that the two countries should resolve the issue through dialogue, it means that they are ignoring the problem. Former US ambassador to Pakistan, Ann Peterson, says India is a key partner in the US region. The US wants India to remain active in limiting China's growing role in the region. That is why the US leadership cannot make India angry over the Kashmir issue.

He said President Trump would do the same. Analysts say the United States wants to benefit from India's conflict with China, but it does not seem likely to succeed in its objectives. China supports Pakistan's stance on Kashmir, but the US and other world powers support China. India wants to see stronger competition in the region, which has increased India's international importance. According to Ann Patterson, India has abolished Articles 370 and 35A at a time when US and Taliban negotiations are in the final stages. And Pakistan's role in this is very important. India has announced the cancellation of Article 370 thoughtfully while the talks between the US and the Taliban are at a critical juncture and Pakistan is gaining importance. As noted above, the United States wants to see India stronger and more powerful than China in the region, so the United States is not displaying such cold spells on Hong Kong and China as the issue is doing on Kashmir. The history of Hong Kong is wonderful. It was a city in southern China in ancient times. In 1840 there was a long war between Britain and China, called Opium War. Britain demanded that China give us spices and other commercial products in exchange for opium, but China refused.

In these opium wars, the British occupied the Chinese city of Hong Kong. After World War II, Hong Kong was under Japanese occupation for a long time. In 1898, the British again joined Hong Kong under the 99-year lease, which was run by the Viceroy of India. In 1984, a joint declaration was signed between British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and the Chinese government, in which the British agreed to hand over Hong Kong to China on the condition that Hong Kong's sovereignty be maintained. Under the agreement, on completion of the 99-year lease, Hong Kong returned to China in 1997, which is being run under the Forest Country, Tosystem formula, in which Hong Kong has limited sovereignty. China has repeatedly threatened to occupy Hong Kong and add it to its mainland China, but under global pressure, China cannot do so. The current status of Hong Kong is that it is neither subservient to China nor is it completely independent of China. Hong Kong is considered one of the most advanced countries in the world. Singapore Airport is the busiest airport in the world after Dubai, where 80 million travelers arrived last year as tourists. The Chinese are not ready to withdraw from Hong Kong politically at any cost.

In agreement with Margaret Thatcher, it was also stated that China is bound to respect Hong Kong's sovereignty over the next 50 years from 1997 to 2047, as time passes, China's anxiety for full occupation of Hong Kong is increasing. But Hong Kong citizens, on the other hand, view China as Jammu and Kashmir India. As 2047 is too far away, China and Hong Kong must decide. The United States, Britain and the West are pushing the heels of damage to Chinese interests in Hong Kong and backing protests in Hong Kong. The United States, which lost to China in the trade war, is desperately seeking revenge. So they are giving air to the insurgency in Hong Kong, but I personally think that the Chinese Communist Party of China has to take over Hong Kong whenever China finds that things are out of control. The situation will be decided by what happens next. Chinese President Shi Jung Ping came to power in 2012, with several weeks of protests in Hong Kong becoming the biggest challenge to his sovereignty. Hong Kong's Constitutional Chief, Mrs Carrie Lama, is a Chinese-approved view, no head can take office without China's blessing. Recent protests were a decision made in June.

Under the law, the Chinese government handed over the accused to Hong Kong for serious crimes and prosecuted them in China. The law had to be suspended following intense protests by Hong Kong citizens, and China went back on its feet, but protesters are now far ahead. Now their demands are not against the said law, they have begun more. He says the temporary suspension of the law is not enough, it should be abolished permanently. All detained citizens should be released and their personal freedoms restored, our protest should be stopped or called illegal. The Chinese government, on the other hand, says that they are doing so on the strength of foreign powers. Over time, extremism and anxiety are increasing on both sides. China has alerted its troops in the Chinese city of Shenezen, 4 km from Hong Kong's border, to reach Hong Kong in 10 minutes from any emergency. China is hitting the ax on its own. This is a kind of hybrid war in which social media is widely used. Facebook and Twitter have alleged that Google's subsidiary YouTube is involved in Chinese propaganda against several Hong Kong protesters.

Google has claimed to close such channels. This war is also being fought on social media platforms. The million dollar question is that the world media and superpowers are worried about the protests in Hong Kong for the last 13 weeks, but Kashmir, where mass killings of Muslims are taking place. Nobody cares about that. The reason why Hong Kong protests are damaging Kashmir is that if there had not been a Hong Kong incident, then China would have taken Ladakh from India, but China is showing great patience on both sides. China's focus is more on Hong Kong than Ladakh, because the United States is openly challenging China. You can imagine the way that protesters carry American flags in anti-Chinese protests. And on the play cards and banners that read "Donald Trump! Help us liberate Hong Kong. " Another interesting aspect of this is that China has withdrawn the law protesting these protests, but the protesters are still on the streets. He says that now our demand is to restore democracy in the country. Elections here and power should be given to democratically elected people, Hong Kong is a backyard or backyard of China, and China will never want the US to occupy its backyard. Things seem to go a long way.

America's dream of strengthening India in the region was to restrict China. Suppose they wear gas masks in the middle of the demonstration, and they use jackets to keep them safe from the charge of police sticks. This week, they successfully closed the road and rail routes to the airport to disrupt international flights. The Hong Kong National Party, an anti-China party, was banned, but recent protests have raised US flags. The protests are in the hands of young 22-year-old Joshua Wong, who specializes in spraying gasoline on the emotions of the younger generation, but Jimmy Lai, the owner of Next Digital, the anti-China mainstream media channel in Hong Kong, is a US pro-billionaire investor. Carr, who recently interviewed US National Security Adviser John Bolton in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, said that no US president considers China better than Donald Trump because Trump is an expert on bullying. I was born. Jimmy Lai began lifting passenger bags at the train station at the age of 9.

Once, a traveler from Hong Kong to China gave him a chocolate that tasted so good to Jimmy that he decided that he would go from China to Hong Kong illegally to prosper. Today, he is the richest man in Hong Kong who has established his empire in the media field. Worldwide clothing brand Giordano is also owned by Jimmy. This is a violation of all the demonstrations of 1989, 2014 and 2019. It also has a newspaper called "Daily Apple" in Hong Kong. The Chinese-backed class of people from Hong Kong is called Jimmy's A Running Dog of USA.Currently, the US National Endowment for Democracy or NED, which is notorious for overthrowing governments around the world, is financing Hong Kong. In the name of democracy, America's role in Degime Change is open to all the world. It remains to be seen if the United States will succeed in Hong Kong this time, and what will be the reaction if China fails. Well China will not allow American ambitions to be fulfilled at any cost. From the above it can be easily understood that the United States is serious where it has its own interests, otherwise…. In the glasses of others is his left-handed game, Not only is Hong Kong's sovereign status established, but the United States is clearly supporting it, while on the other hand, the United States has no objection to the elimination of Kashmir's special status and the hot market of oppression there.